SAMPLE REPORT·CONSUMER / WELLNESS·FIELDED JUN 2025

A consumer-product reaction study, frame by frame.

SOURCE-LINKEDANONYMIZEDn = 112VIDEO + EMOTION
METHOD
Emotion-coded video + survey + AI-moderated interviews
SAMPLE
112 usable (535 eligible, 1,000 entered)
INPUTS
340 surveys · 127 reaction videos · 112 interviews
SPLIT
69 women · 43 men · ages 25–54
STIMULUS
One 70-second promo video
FIELDED
Jun 2025
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY · OPEN

Across 112 consumers, the survey said greenlight and the faces said wait. Stated interest ran hot — 89 of 112 rated the experience 8 or higher out of 10 — but in-the-moment emotion stayed mild, peaking only near the 40-second mark , and the in-the-moment read was carried by a single gentle rise in happiness, nothing else . The gap between what people said and how they reacted is the whole report: the creative earns its best beat after viewers have already decided how to feel, and the lukewarm read traces back to unanswered questions about price and safety, not bad taste.

89/112
rated interest 8+ out of 10
~40s
where in-the-moment emotion peaked
52–70%
named price as the top purchase blocker
112
qualified consumers, video + interview
KEY FINDINGS · OPEN

Five findings — where attention held, where it dropped.

Each finding links to its source evidence — the emotion curve, verbatim interview quotes, and the share of respondents who voiced it. The full evidence layer ships in the downloadable report.

FINDING 01HIGH IMPACT

The reaction peaks too late — value lands after the decision

"Yeah, what I saw, that's quite okay. It's really, really amazing. It's something I already want to explore."

low to ~20speaks ~40sfades to end
EMOTION TIMELINE · 0:00 – 4:32
0:001:303:004:32
FINDING 02HIGH IMPACT

Said-vs-felt gap — the slider ran hot, the face stayed mild

"I think nothing changes as long as I enjoy it… the experience will be lovely based on the introduction video. But I don't think anything can make me more interested."

89/112 rated 8+happiness onlypeak ~3.0 of 5
RATED 8+ ON STATED INTEREST
79%
FINDING 03HIGH IMPACT

Price ambiguity — people guessed expensive and braced for it

"Wow. Are you for real? I was actually budgeting, like, ten thousand. Okay, so yeah — I'm so going to buy and gift it."

52% on one Q70% on follow-upguesses ran high
NAMED PRICE AS A BLOCKER
70%
FINDING 04MED IMPACT

Safety unknowns — the unstated fear filled the vacuum

"The only thing that would detract me is fear of something going wrong, because I have anxiety. I'm very anxious and fearful."

28% feared damage/harm27% raised an ethics concernall unprompted
RAISED A SAFETY OR HARM CONCERN
28%
FINDING 05LOW IMPACT

Timing is a non-issue — the one thing survey and faces agree on

"The time doesn't really determine my participation. I've anticipated this kind of experience. Whatever time it is, I'll clear my schedule."

69% timing won't decidesurvey agreesstop spending on it
SAY TIMING WON'T AFFECT THE DECISION
69%

Lead recommendation surfaced from Findings 01 and 03

RECOMMENDATION · DEFENSIBLE

Move the payoff forward. State the price plainly inside the first ten seconds and pair it with two reassurances people went looking for — that it's safe, and that it's worth it on its own terms. The peak reaction already exists in the footage; the job is to land it while attention is still live and close the unknowns that turn a warm idea into a hesitant maybe.

FRONT-LOAD VALUENAME THE PRICEKILL THE UNKNOWNS112 PARTICIPANTS
EVIDENCE STRENGTH
79%
EVIDENCE PREVIEW · OPEN

Two verbatims behind the said-vs-felt gap.

TRANSCRIPT · INTEREST THEME · 79%
The whole experience, you get to see things from an angle we can't on the ground. Honestly, I'd love it. But the price, possibly — for an experience you really can't put a price tag on it.
INTEREST · 79%THEME · STATEDFINDING 02
TRANSCRIPT · PRICE THEME · 70%
The only thing that can detract me is price. I'm okay with the location and time zone, there's nothing I'm afraid of going wrong. The only thing is price.
PRICE · 70%THEME · BLOCKERFINDING 03
PERSONAS · OPEN

Four reaction segments — who the re-cut has to convince.

Segmented from emotion response and interview language, each with its share of the sample and the line that defines it.

35–40%MAIN PERSONA

The Warm Maybe

"It's really amazing, something I already want to explore. I just need to see the value for the price."

Rates interest high, reacts mildly, and stalls on a single open question: is it worth the money? Answer the price up front and this segment converts. Leave it ambiguous and they drift.

20–25%EASY WIN

The Gift-Giver

"I'm so going to buy and gift it — to loved ones, family, my children, to experience this."

Already sold on the idea as a present for someone else. 65 of 112 would buy it as a gift. They don't need persuading on the experience, only a clean, confident price and a reason to act now.

20–25%WINNABLE

The Anxious Holdout

"Something going wrong — I didn't even think of that. I have anxiety. That's the thing that would stop me."

Wants in but invents worst-case scenarios the video never addressed: safety, harm, things going wrong. Name the safeguards on screen and most of the fear evaporates.

10–15%HARDEST

The Authenticity Skeptic

"It depends what you're interested in. It's a substitute — I'd still rather do the real thing."

Reads the experience as a stand-in for the genuine article rather than its own thing. The smallest segment and the hardest to move; the re-cut should get ahead of the comparison instead of ignoring it.

YOUR STUDY, YOUR CUSTOMERS

This is one real study, anonymized. The next one could be about your customers.

We don't share client reports — but we'll run a study like this one on your audience and hand you the full evidence trail: every finding traceable to a clip, a transcript, and a segment. Book a 30-minute working session and we'll scope it against a real question of yours.

Get a demo